docs: add GPT-5.2 benchmark results to PR benchmark documentation
Some checks are pending
Build-and-test / build-and-test (push) Waiting to run
docs-ci / deploy (push) Waiting to run

This commit is contained in:
ofir-frd 2025-12-14 14:20:16 +02:00
parent 3b81bb5830
commit dac6effffd

View file

@ -34,6 +34,12 @@ A list of the models used for generating the baseline suggestions, and example r
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:left;">GPT-5.2</td>
<td style="text-align:left;">2025-12-11</td>
<td style="text-align:left;">medium</td>
<td style="text-align:center;"><b>80.8</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:left;">GPT-5-pro</td>
<td style="text-align:left;">2025-10-06</td>
@ -183,6 +189,22 @@ A list of the models used for generating the baseline suggestions, and example r
## Results Analysis (Latest Additions)
### GPT-5.2 ('medium' thinking budget)
Final score: **80.8**
Strengths:
- **Broad, context-aware coverage:** Frequently identifies multiple high-impact faults in the added lines and proposes fixes that surpass or equal the best prior answer in many cases (≈60 % of the 399 comparisons).
- **Actionable, minimal patches:** Tends to supply concise before/after code snippets that compile/run, keep changes local, and respect limits (≤3 suggestions, touched-lines only) making the advice easy to apply.
- **Clear reasoning & prioritisation:** Usually explains why an issue is critical, ranks it properly (e.g., crash > style), and avoids clutter, resulting in focused reviews that align with real test failures.
Weaknesses:
- **Critical omissions remain common:** In a sizeable minority of examples the model overlooks the single most blocking error (e.g., compile-time break, nil-deref, enum mismatch), causing it to trail a sharper peer answer.
- **Occasional inaccurate or harmful fixes:** It sometimes introduces non-compiling code, speculative refactors, or misguided changes to unchanged lines, lowering reliability.
- **Inconsistent guideline adherence:** A non-trivial set of replies add off-scope edits, non-critical style nits, or empty suggestion lists when clear bugs exist, leading to avoidable downgrades.
### GPT-5-pro
Final score: **73.4**